The Weekly Investor
Macro

Yield Curve Positive Again — But the Risk Isn't Over

The 2s10s spread sits at +50 bps, but with core PCE tracking 3.2% and three Fed hawks pushing for hikes, the curve's return to positive slope carries a warning.

August 25, 2026

Key Points

  • The 2s10s spread has re-steepened to +50 basis points, with the 10-year at 4.74% and the 2-year at 4.24% as of August 21.
  • The steepening is driven by structural long-end pressure — not Fed dovishness — with the 30-year hovering near a 19-year high and core PCE still tracking at 3.2%.
  • Friday's Warsh keynote and August 29's PCE print are the two events that determine whether this steepening extends or reverses sharply.


The 2s10s Treasury spread is positive for the first time in years — sitting at 50 basis points with the 10-year yield at 4.74% and the 2-year at 4.24% as of August 21 — and experienced bond traders know that a return to positive slope is not always a relief signal. Sometimes it means the long end is breaking away for the wrong reasons.

Why This Steepening Is Different

A normal bull steepener happens when the short end rallies on rate-cut expectations while the long end holds. That is not what this is. The 2-year at 4.24% is consistent with a market pricing Fed stasis — SOFR at 3.65% and the effective fed funds rate at 3.63% leave almost no easing priced into the front end. The steepening here is being driven by the long end moving higher, a bear steepener, which is the more structurally uncomfortable configuration. The 30-year Treasury yield hovering near a 19-year high is the signature of a market demanding more term premium — more compensation for holding duration — not a market growing confident that inflation is beaten.
The underlying data explains why. Core CPI came in at 2.5% year-over-year through July — the lowest reading since 2021 — and the monthly prints on both CPI and PPI have been soft. But core PCE, the Fed's actual preferred gauge, is still tracking at 3.2% year-over-year according to Barclays' estimates ahead of the July print on August 29. That 70-basis-point gap between what core CPI says and what core PCE says is not a rounding error — it reflects the weight differences between the two indexes, particularly in shelter and healthcare costs, and it matters enormously because the Fed watches PCE, not CPI. A market celebrating the CPI cooldown without fully pricing the stickier PCE trajectory is a market that may be reading the disinflation story too aggressively.
The energy component compounds the problem. WTI crude at $84.05 per barrel and Brent at $92.51 are not crisis levels, but they are not benign either. The July 29 FOMC statement explicitly called out "supply shocks that have driven price increases in certain sectors, including energy" as a partial explanation for inflation remaining above the 2% target. With Middle East conflict risk ongoing and no resolution visible on the supply side, the energy variable remains live — and it feeds directly into both headline PCE and the 5-year, 5-year forward inflation breakeven that the Fed monitors as a gauge of long-run expectations. Long-end yields are partly telling you that market participants do not fully trust the disinflation story to hold.

The Fed's Fingerprints on the Long End

Fiscal dynamics are the second driver of long-end pressure, and they are operating in parallel with inflation concerns. Federal deficits have required sustained Treasury issuance at elevated levels, adding supply to the long end at exactly the moment when the Fed's quantitative tightening program continues to shrink its balance sheet. That combination — more supply, less Fed demand — is a mechanical upward force on the 10-year and 30-year that exists independent of where anyone thinks the federal funds rate is going next month. Bond market participants are being asked to absorb that supply at a time when real yields remain elevated and the Fed has shown no inclination to resume asset purchases.
The three hawkish dissenters at the July 29 meeting — Hammack, Kashkari, and Logan — matter here for a specific reason. Their dissent is a signal that the internal FOMC debate has not concluded. Nine of eighteen participants in the June dot plot penciled in at least one hike before year-end. If even two or three of those participants are persuaded by subsequent data — or by a Warsh speech that validates the hawkish view — the front end of the curve reprices upward, compressing the 2s10s spread, and the bear steepener becomes a bear flattener again. That is the scenario that inflicts the most pain across fixed income: the long end stays elevated on structural supply and inflation concerns, while the short end rises on renewed hike expectations, crushing both ends of the duration trade simultaneously.
The unemployment rate at 4.1% through July is the one variable that complicates the hawkish narrative. A labor market at 4.1% with a negative payroll print in the rear-view mirror is not a hot economy by historical standards. Walmart has already flagged consumer pullback. Growth is slowing enough that Wells Fargo Investment Institute noted the Fed "may be moving towards rate hikes, but for now remains on pause to allow for more time and flexibility." The pause is real — but so is the conditionality. One upside surprise in August CPI, due September 11, changes the math for September 16 meaningfully.

What Traders Watch Next

For fixed income traders, the immediate levels are mechanical. The 10-year at 4.74% has been the line of resistance — if Warsh's Friday remarks are read as hawkish and PCE on August 29 disappoints, a test of 4.90% is on the table. That level, if broken on a closing basis, would represent a significant technical breach and trigger further selling from duration-sensitive allocators including pension funds and insurance companies that use long Treasuries to liability-match. Conversely, a neutral Warsh combined with a soft PCE — core up just 0.1% month-over-month as expected — would give the 10-year room to retrace toward 4.55% to 4.60%, where several technical models place near-term support.
For equity traders, the yield curve's shape has a direct read-through. Utilities and REITs have been pricing the hold-into-cut scenario, and both sectors remain vulnerable if the long end extends higher. Regional banks and financial services firms benefit from positive slope in principle, but a simultaneous rise in the short end would erode that benefit by compressing net interest margins on floating-rate liabilities. The cleanest equity expression of a continued bear steepener is short duration growth — long-dated cash flow multiples compress predictably when the 10-year moves higher, regardless of near-term earnings.
The calendar this week is the determinant. Wednesday's Q2 GDP second estimate at 8:30 a.m. ET is the first data point — a material downward revision undercuts the growth argument for hikes and should put mild downward pressure on the 10-year. Warsh speaks Friday morning. PCE prints Friday. Traders who wait for all three data points before repositioning will have the clearest picture, but the most actionable pricing window likely closes before PCE hits the wire. Watch 4.74% on the 10-year as the pivot; a sustained break above it heading into the September 16 FOMC decision signals the market is taking the hawks seriously, regardless of what Warsh says.

The Weekly Investor

Daily market analysis for active traders. Free.

Keep Reading

View more
Vanguard Pulls $5.96B as Invesco Bleeds $4.61B

Sep 8, 20265 min read

Vanguard Pulls $5.96B as Invesco Bleeds $4.61B

Vanguard hauled in $5.96B Tuesday while Invesco shed $4.61B. The rotation into T-bill ETFs and out of credit reveals exactly what the jobs report did to rate expectations.